gsx doesn't get support for linux disto's as much as workstation or
other os's for that matter - wkstn has support for vista, gsx i don't
think does, can't boot off a ghost image,  just two off the top of my
hat - I am more used to esx and workstation though so a little biased

On 2/6/06, Ben Ruset <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Blah. It's just as full featured as Workstation. And no, it's not as
> full featured as ESX, but unless you're running a datacenter, need
> virtual VLANs, need failover and HA, ESX is overkill.
>
> Plus, GSX supports more OS's than ESX right now. You can't install RHEL4
> under ESX yet, for example.
>
> j m g wrote:
> > cnet i think it was reported that VMWare was going to free up GSX
> > server only - sometime this week and they didn't have any details of
> > the licensing
> >
> > gsx ends up being their middle fo the road product, not as
> > flexible/full featured/robust as either their workstation product for
> > flex or esx for stability or 1 to many ratio
> >
> > On 2/6/06, Bobby Heid <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >> VMWare is going to be giving away VMware Server.  I can't really find out
> >> much about it (use wise).  Is this something that a developer could use?
> >> And what about VMWare Workstation (which is not free, I AFAIK)?
> >>
> >> Thanks,
> >> Bobby
> >>
> >>
> >
> >
> > --
> > -jmg
> > -sapere aude
> >
> >
>


--
-jmg
-sapere aude

Reply via email to