It has eliminated the need for any real-time malware scanner product.
From: "Greg Sevart" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Reply-To: The Hardware List <[email protected]>
To: "The Hardware List" <[email protected]>
Subject: Re: [H] Antivirus
Date: Fri, 3 Mar 2006 12:15:30 -0600
I can confirm.
SAV-CE is a completely different codebase from the crap consumer grade
stuff that is Norton branded.
10.0.2 is taking 33MB of memory on thix box (I have 2GB), which I don't
consider very bad.
I still argue it is among (if not the) best AV scanner available--it just
isn't available to the average consumer. Most people (for good reason) hate
the Norton consumer stuff, and assume that the corporate stuff is
related...but nothing could be further from the truth.
Interestingly, I've heard that SAV-CE10 also is the most effective malware
scanner out there--but it runs slower than anything else at this task.
Greg
----- Original Message ----- From: "Hayes Elkins"
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[email protected]>
Sent: Friday, March 03, 2006 11:18 AM
Subject: RE: [H] Antivirus
The latest Symantec AntiVirus corporate edition client (10.0.2.2020) takes
about 30MB of memory footprint these days. It does however do a much
better job than the retail home user version (norton), however it will get
more false positives.
From: Jin-Wei Tioh <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Reply-To: The Hardware List <[email protected]>
To: The Hardware List <[email protected]>
Subject: RE: [H] Antivirus
Date: Fri, 03 Mar 2006 10:54:49 -0600
At 02:28 PM 3/2/2006, you wrote:
Norton is definitely not even close to kaspersky in detection accuracy.
Not to mention that it seems to be more resource heavy. Always hated
the startup time degradations with Norton. Much improved after I
switched to Kaspersky.
--
JW
