LOL Uwe's so bad his either infamous for being bad or
totally unknown!
Steve has always been controversial and like some of
the geekier geeks a bit
hard to listen to without good "filters" on the
listeners. I dig SN even if
there is not total accuracy I think they manage to
explain some tough topics in
a way that enables smart people to "get it". Like
reading Wiki's, one can fill
in the blanks or correct the errors after you consume
the data. ;)
Thane Sherrington wrote:
> At 12:40 PM 05/02/2008, Anthony Q. Martin wrote:
>
>> I don't know who Uwe Boll is! :)
>
> You need to watch more crappy movies. :)
Bloodrayne, for instance. But
> don't pay for it. :)
>
>
>> I don't think one can hope to learn any kind of
detailed info from his
>> podcast unless one is already very close to that
field. Some extra
>> study will be required. Still, I think his
podcasts are very good
>> overall. Certainly better than listening to a top
40 station on the
>> way to work!
>
> Amen.
>
> T
>
>
____________________________________________________________________________________
Never miss a thing. Make Yahoo your home page.
http://www.yahoo.com/r/hs
