I'm on the waiting list on their site, they said 1-2 months.  Turns
out a lot of people think its a pretty nice product :(

On Wed, Mar 5, 2008 at 10:56 AM, Robert Martin Jr. <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Where are you getting the Popcorn Hour from? Looks pretty nice.
>
>  lopaka
>
>  Brian Weeden <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Going to be buying the parts for a 
> new PC next week and I'm pretty
>
>
> psyched as I'm replacing an Athlon system I built 3-4  years ago and
>  have been upgrading piecemeal.  So I've got a 3000+ Athlon 64 running
>  on an nForce4 mobo.
>
>  After 6 months of research I am still debating over dual core vs quad
>  core.  I'm going to continue using my existing video card as it's
>  doing just fine and here's the rest of the parts list:
>
>  Mobo - Asus P5K-E/WIFI-AP
>  PSU - OCZ Stealthstream 600W
>  RAM - 2x2GB G.Skill DDR2 800
>  DVD - Samsung SH-S203B
>  Fans - 2x Scythe 120mm
>
>  So I'm debating between these two CPUs:
>  Q6600 Kentsfield (2.4 Ghz, Quadcore, 65nm)
>  E8400 Wolfsdale (3.0 Ghz, Dualcore, 45nm)
>
>  They are both within $20 in price so really it comes down to other
>  features.  I know that the majority of programs these days don't take
>  advantage of more than 2 cores (except for the multimedia big boys
>  like Photoshop and video encoders).  While I will be using the machine
>  for some A/V work, that won't be a common task.  More commonly it will
>  be for multitasking several programs at once under Windows XP for work
>  and then gaming.
>
>  The kicker is that I am getting rid of my HTPC and replacing it with a
>  NAS and the Popcorn Hour settop box.  The HTPC used to be my ripping,
>  encoding, burning, and downloading box which was nice because I could
>  offload those intensive (both time and horsepower) tasks to it and not
>  have it slow down my main PC that I use for work and gaming.  With it
>  going away, those tasks will now be done on my main PC.  I was
>  envisioning perhaps running 2 or 3 VMs at once doing all these various
>  tasks.  Anyone see problems with that under XP and the ability for
>  those VMs to use separate CPUs and RAM?  Or am I reaching too far and
>  is this something I can't do under XP?  I have several work programs
>  that are Windows only (along with games) which are the two reasons I
>  haven't gone to Ubuntu.
>
>  ----
>  Brian
>
>

Reply via email to