Printed your reply for later reading.
Not sure you answered my question.................. :)
I do like the 10.x.x.x series, however.....
Can you go back and re-read my question?

Understand your outside "offices" sort of, for now.
I was just focusing on the x.x.x.0-253 business in the home range.
Still with you.
Best,
Duncan

At 16:48 07/22/2008 -0700, you wrote:
Yeah, I've got sites with only 10 PC's and 10 users and they still
give 'em the a whole 256 address block. They don't care because it's
all 10 dot inside and nat'ed.

So one office is 10.1.1.0-255, the next is 10.1.2.0-255, the next
10.1.3.0-255, and so on.

Switches and routers are all x.x.x.0-10, servers x.x.x.11-20, printers
x.x.x.21-35, etc.  Spare static IP's for growth are x.x.x.36-50, and
user DHCP starts at x.x.x.51 and up.

No reason to the scheme other than just to standardize all the sites a
wee bit.  :)


On Jul 22, 2008, at 3:58 PM, DHSinclair wrote:

Thanks John,
So, if I read this correct, all clients are >a.b.c.51?
But, I do see that you do limit your routers to the bottom of the
range.
Like I asked. No biggie.  I am getting ready to do battle with ATT
about
their local service......
Wondering.  No change planned ATM.
Thanks,
Duncan

At 15:41 07/22/2008 -0700, you wrote:
No.. At my last job they had all the routers at x.x.x.254, and now
we have them all at x.x.x.1.  Just standards and differing
numbering schemes.  :) We reserve the first 50 addies for routers,
switches, printers, servers etc, and start DHCP addressing for each
site at x.x.x.51..  -- JRS [EMAIL PROTECTED] Please remove
**X** to reply... Facts do not cease to exist just because they are
ignored. ----- Original Message ---- From: DHSinclair <[EMAIL PROTECTED] > To: Hardware Group <[email protected]> Sent: Tuesday,
July 22, 2008 3:17:17 PM Subject: [H] router/gateway address? Is
there any efficiency in changing my router/gateway address from:
x:x:1:253 to an address of: x:x:1:1 ?????? Thanks, Duncan


--
JRS     [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Please remove  **X**  to reply...

Facts do not cease to exist just
because they are ignored.

Reply via email to