Not sure.  I haven't gone looking for bench marks on CPUs/mobos in a few
years.

---------------------------
Brian Weeden
Technical Consultant
Secure World Foundation <http://www.secureworldfoundtion.org>
+1 (514) 466-2756 Canada
+1 (202) 683-8534 US


On Thu, Oct 9, 2008 at 8:05 AM, Steve Tomporowski <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>wrote:

> Is there any good place to look for benchmarks?  Trying to find
> something on anandtech is like pulling teeth....
>
> On Wed, Oct 8, 2008 at 7:32 PM, Brian Weeden <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> wrote:
> > Depends what the bottleneck is.  If it's something that's using a lot of
> CPU
> > cycles and is multithreaded (meaning the software is written to it can
> take
> > advantage of multiple cores) then it should be great.  But if you're
> doing
> > something like video editing and working with massive file sizes then you
> > also have to consider your I/O bandwidth.
> >
> > Doesn't matter how beefy your CPU is or how many you have if they are
> > waiting for you to load a couple TBs from a remote disk.
> >
> > ---------------------------
> > Brian Weeden
> > Technical Consultant
> > Secure World Foundation <http://www.secureworldfoundtion.org>
> > +1 (514) 466-2756 Canada
> > +1 (202) 683-8534 US
> >
> >
> > On Wed, Oct 8, 2008 at 7:24 PM, Steve Tomporowski <[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >wrote:
> >
> >> That's actually a good reason for going quad is to be able to get a
> >> lot running at the same time and still be snappy.  Which brings to
> >> mind what a quad core would do for my music production.  Generally you
> >> get limited in the number of software synths running.  If you were
> >> running a VST host like Cubase, would the extra cores allow you to
> >> load up on the synths?  Interesting question.
> >>
> >> Steve
> >>
> >> On Wed, Oct 8, 2008 at 10:35 AM, Brian Weeden <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> >> wrote:
> >> > You're right, for the most part nothing common really uses quad cores.
> >> > Supreme Commander is the only game I've played recently that does that
> I
> >> can
> >> > think of.
> >> >
> >> > I went with quad because at the time it was essentially the same price
> as
> >> > the dual core and I multitask a lot with some heavy duty programs.
>  I'm
> >> > happy.
> >> >
> >> > ---------------------------
> >> > Brian Weeden
> >> > Technical Consultant
> >> > Secure World Foundation <http://www.secureworldfoundtion.org>
> >> > +1 (514) 466-2756 Canada
> >> > +1 (202) 683-8534 US
> >> >
> >> >
> >> > On Wed, Oct 8, 2008 at 10:25 AM, Steve Tomporowski <
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >> >wrote:
> >> >
> >> >> Thanks guys for a couple of configurations to look at.  My previous
> >> >> upgrade to a different computer I went with a 6850 over the Q6600,
> >> >> mainly because not much runs on Quad.  With normal gaming (UT3) what
> >> >> would I expect from Quad?  Anything?
> >> >>
> >> >> Also, are Nvidia chipsets that bad now?
> >> >>
> >> >> I know the processor/board of choice these days is Intel, does
> >> >> anything AMD offer worth anything?
> >> >>
> >> >> Thanks...Steve
> >> >>
> >> >> On Mon, Oct 6, 2008 at 4:55 PM, Brian Weeden <[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >
> >> >> wrote:
> >> >> > I upgraded a couple months ago to a Q6600 and an Abit IX38 Quad GT
> >> mobo
> >> >> and
> >> >> > I'm very happy.  I had the whole struggle between quad and dual
> core
> >> and
> >> >> > opted for the quad.  The motheboard is one of the most stable ones
> I
> >> have
> >> >> > ever had.
> >> >> >
> >> >> > Unlike the two 780G mobos I've had in my HTPC, both of which have
> been
> >> >> > giving me nothing but problems.
> >> >> >
> >> >> > ---------
> >> >> > Brian
> >> >> >
> >> >> >
> >> >> > On Sun, Oct 5, 2008 at 9:34 AM, James Boswell <
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> >> >> wrote:
> >> >> >
> >> >> >> E8500
> >> >> >> Asus P5Q mainboard
> >> >> >> 4GB of DDR2-800
> >> >> >>
> >> >> >> That should just about cover it.
> >> >> >>
> >> >> >>
> >> >> >> On 5 Oct 2008, at 14:21, Steve Tomporowski wrote:
> >> >> >>
> >> >> >>  I am looking to upgrade the processor/motherboard on my 'oldest'
> >> >> >>> system.  It's a Neo 4 Platinum with an Athlon X2 3800+.  I'm not
> >> >> >>> looking for the bleeding edge, but for something that'll give me
> a
> >> >> >>> substantial increase in speed for games.  I've got an Nvidia 280
> >> right
> >> >> >>> now, so that's set.
> >> >> >>>
> >> >> >>> What's hot now?
> >> >> >>>
> >> >> >>> Thanks....Steve
> >> >> >>>
> >> >> >>
> >> >> >>
> >> >> >
> >> >>
> >> >
> >>
> >
>

Reply via email to