At 11:01 AM 16/10/2008, Greg Sevart wrote:
Both, by a large margin.
Interesting. If they are drastically slower than tape, then they aren't much good as a back up device - tape is bad enough.
T
> -----Original Message----- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:hardware- > [EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Thane Sherrington > Sent: Thursday, October 16, 2008 8:56 AM > To: [email protected] > Subject: Re: [H] Blu-Ray as a backup device > > At 10:42 AM 16/10/2008, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > >I have a client who does this > > > >Pros: media is reliable, can be permanently stored, easier access > then tape > > > >Con: media is expensive and backups are very slow. > > Slower than tape or slower than HD? > > T >
