You're right - the bastards at Microsoft have disabled the multiple
concurrent users capability for XP, Vista, and Win 7 and it's only available
as a feature in Server 2003.  They justify it by saying it is a feature that
only business users want, which is crap - obviously they are just looking
for some features to justify the extra money for Server.

Fortunately, you can easily re-enable it.  Here's how to do it in Windows
Vista, Windows 7 Beta, and Windows 7 RTM:

http://www.missingremote.com/index.php?option=com_content&task=view&id=3293&Itemid=232

And for Windows XP SP3:

http://alonbilu.wordpress.com/2008/05/17/enabling-multiple-concurrent-remote-sessions-on-windows-xp-sp3-patched-file-included/

---------------------------
Brian Weeden
Technical Advisor
Secure World Foundation <http://www.secureworldfoundation.org>
Montreal Office
+1 (514) 466-2756 Canada
+1 (202) 683-8534 US


On Thu, Oct 22, 2009 at 11:24 AM, Scott Sipe <[email protected]> wrote:

> Are there any major versions of windows you can do this on?
>
> I know on our Windows Server 2003 server with Terminal Services enabled we
> can connect multiple users, but on XP pro (version I'm most familiar with)
> you can't have one user logged on locally and another remote desktop
> user--it's one or the other? When the Remote Desktop user connects, the
> local screen blanks, and if you're logging on as a new user, the current
> session gets logged off first.
>
> If there's a way to get around this, I'd love to hear it!
>
> Scott
>
> On Oct 22, 2009, at 10:59 AM, Brian Weeden wrote:
>
>  Sure - use Remote Desktop Protocol (RDP) and log into a different account
>> than the one the user is logged into.
>>
>> And of course windows is multi-user - where did you get the idea it
>> wasn't?
>>
>> ---------------------------
>> Brian Weeden
>> Technical Advisor
>> Secure World Foundation <http://www.secureworldfoundation.org>
>> Montreal Office
>> +1 (514) 466-2756 Canada
>> +1 (202) 683-8534 US
>>
>>
>> On Thu, Oct 22, 2009 at 10:45 AM, Thane Sherrington <
>> [email protected]> wrote:
>>
>>  In Unix, I can access the box remotely in a separate screen so that the
>>> local user can't see what I'm doing and can continue to use the system.
>>>  Is
>>> there a way to do this in Windows?  (I don't think there is, since
>>> Windows
>>> isn't really multi-user, but I figured I'd ask.)
>>>
>>> T
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>

Reply via email to