NFS is a much more efficient protocol for serving network files compared to
SMB.

I'd need a server module for NFS, not a client one.  There are a couple of
NFS server apps for Windows out there (FreeNFS and Hanewin) but people have
had mixed results using them for my application.



---------
Brian



On Tue, Mar 5, 2013 at 6:59 AM, Anthony Q. Martin <[email protected]>wrote:

> Why do you need NFS?  I'm just curious.
>
> From what I have read. if you are running Win7 Ultimate, there is a client
> for NFS that you have to install, because it does not come pre-installed.
>
> http://answers.microsoft.com/**en-us/windows/forum/windows_7-**
> networking/nfs-client-for-**windows-7/8e1d80e4-f601-4758-**
> 9711-72c8b003e5c9<http://answers.microsoft.com/en-us/windows/forum/windows_7-networking/nfs-client-for-windows-7/8e1d80e4-f601-4758-9711-72c8b003e5c9>
>
> http://www.blackviper.com/**windows-services/client-for-**nfs/<http://www.blackviper.com/windows-services/client-for-nfs/>
>
>
>
> On 3/4/2013 4:03 PM, Brian Weeden wrote:
>
>> Need some advice on OS for my media server.  I've been using Win7 for a
>> while, but need to move to something that supports NFS.  From what I've
>> read, Win7 doesn't and won't.
>>
>> While I'm aware of the *nix world out there that might be an option,
>> nearly
>> all of my experience is with Windows and given that I really don't have
>> time to learn a new OS I will need to stick with Windows.
>>
>> With the demise of Windows Home Server, I think my options are Windows
>> Server 2008 or the new Server 2012 Essentials.  What are the pros/cons of
>> each?
>>
>> My media server does triple duty: it hosts the 20 TB of files for network
>> clients (using FlexRAID), it acts as a HTPC frontend for the downstairs
>> theater (using XBMC), and it serves as a ripping/converting machine
>> (through RDP access to a second client session).
>>
>> I guess another option would be to separate out the fileserver from the
>> frontend/ripping duties, but that would involve some major system reconfig
>> and additional hardware that I would really not prefer to do.
>>
>> ---------
>> Brian
>>
>>
>

Reply via email to