Not really an option as you're just giving them more money - they charge
you the same whether you have a subsidized phone or not.

------
Brian
 On Aug 24, 2013 7:09 PM, "Bryan Seitz" <se...@bsd-unix.net> wrote:

> return the phone get a google edition phone.  I love Verizon's network
> hate their customer treatment / support.
>
> On Sat, Aug 24, 2013 at 12:48:51PM -0400, Brian Weeden wrote:
> > Finally got my HTC One today.  Had to wait for it to come to Verizon
> > because my wife and I decided we were going to stick with her existing
> > account there.
> >
> > Bad news is that one day after launch the evil f$&ckers at Verizon
> blocked
> > the ability to unlock the boot loader:
> >
> http://androidandme.com/2013/08/smartphones-2/verizon-htc-one-bootloader-no-longer-unlockable/
> >
> > So, question is, what should I do now?  I really want to get rid of the
> > Veizon bloatware, and would love to put either Google Edition firmware on
> > it or maybe even Cyanogen.  Do I have any hope for either of those to be
> an
> > option at some point in the near future?  Or am I screwed?
> >
> > ---
> > Brian
> >
> >
> >
> > On Monday, August 5, 2013, Robert Martin Jr. wrote:
> >
> > > I'm interested in hearing how it goes. I've had a few android phones
> and
> > > all were rooted with custom ROM's within the first couple days. I use
> > > virgin mobile and on that network it's very important to register the
> phone
> > > to their service before you root and install a custom ROM. The phone
> won't
> > > register correctly otherwise. I love android phones but only after
> > > installing a custom ROM with the tools I prefer. They usually come with
> > > loads of crapware that needs to be gone. CyanogenMod is usually my
> > > preferred ROM.
> > >
> > >
> > > lopaka
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > ________________________________
> > >  From: Naushad Zulfiqar <z00...@gmail.com <javascript:;>>
> > > To: hardw...@lists.hardwaregroup.com <javascript:;>
> > > Sent: Monday, August 5, 2013 1:08 PM
> > > Subject: Re: [H] Android
> > >
> > >
> > > Cool, just excited to see what you think of Android.  Let me know once
> you
> > > get it.
> > >
> > > Thanks!
> > >
> > >
> > > On Mon, Aug 5, 2013 at 11:06 PM, Brian Weeden <brian.wee...@gmail.com
> > > >wrote:
> > >
> > > > No, had  to wait a week. It's going to be a work phone and I have to
> > > > double-check with my employer to make sure they're going to cover the
> > > plan
> > > > I want before signing the contract.
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > ---------
> > > > Brian
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > On Mon, Aug 5, 2013 at 4:04 PM, Naushad Zulfiqar <z00...@gmail.com>
> > > wrote:
> > > >
> > > > > Did you get it?
> > > > >
> > > > > :)
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > On Sun, Aug 4, 2013 at 4:48 AM, Brian Weeden <
> brian.wee...@gmail.com>
> > > > > wrote:
> > > > >
> > > > > > Thanks man, I think I'll pull to trigger tomorrow on the phone
> and
> > > then
> > > > > > I'll start playing around.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > I don't really play games on my phone or do anything really
> > > intensive.
> > > > > >  Mostly email, browsing, reading, and light apps.  So the max
> battery
> > > > > life
> > > > > > tweak sound good to me.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > -------
> > > > > > Brian Weeden
> > > > > > Secure World Foundation
> > > > > > +1 202 683-8534
> > > > > >
> > > > > > On Aug 3, 2013, at 20:45, Naushad Zulfiqar <z00...@gmail.com>
> wrote:
> > > > > >
> > > > > > > I agree with your assessment.  HTC has better hardware
> (physical)
> > > and
> > > > > > > software (sense 5) vs Samsung (Plastic and Touchwiz).  Samsung
> is
> > > too
> > > > > > > cartoony and weird looking for me.  Regarding the hardware
> button,
> > > I
> > > > > also
> > > > > > > agree, hardware button is pretty bad to use and I don't like
> it.
> > > >  That
> > > > > > > said, the HTC ONE is a capacitive button and also set up the
> wrong
> > > > way
> > > > > > (not
> > > > > > > following android guidelines).  There is some weirdness going
> on
> > > with
> > > > > HTC
> > > > > > > also, such as hitting home twice for the task manager and other
> > > > > > keypresses
> > > > > > > to get Google Now.
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > I've owned several high end phones over the years, and for some
> > > > > reason, I
> > > > > > > still prefer the on screen keys that the Nexus 4 provides.
>  Along
> > > > with
> > > > > > the
> > > > > > > MOTO X and some other models.
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > About OTA, some custom roms do offer OTA, but their OTA can be
> half
> > > > > baked
> > > > > > > or really well done.  But in either way, you download the full
> > > > package
> > > > > > and
> > > > > > > then upon accepting the OTA it automatically goes into
> recovery and
> > > > > > flashes
> > > > > > > it or you flash it manually.  Thankfully the process is not too
> > > > painful
> > > > > > and
> > > > > > > the OTA's don't come too often, maybe once a couple of weeks
> or in
> > > > some
> > > > > > > cases once a month.
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > One more thing, with android you never change the bootloader,
> just
> > > > the
> > > > > > > recovery and ROM.  Speaking of recoveries there are mainly 2
> out
> > > > there.
> > > > > > > CWM (Clockwork) and TWRP.  TWRP is more graphical and supports
> the
> > > > Open
> > > > > > > Recovery Script that a lot of ROMS use to automate stuff like
> > > > flashing
> > > > > > the
> > > > > > > ROM, then modem, then something else, then wiping dalvik cache
> and
> > > > > other
> > > > > > > stuff, so that's why I recommended TWRP (Team Win Recovery
> > > Project).
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > With either recovery it's advisable to first do a nandroid
> backup
> > > > from
> > > > > > > within the recovery.  This is akin to creating an ISO image of
> your
> > > > > > phone,
> > > > > > > so if you flash to a newer version of a ROM or to a different
> ROM
> > > and
> > > > > > don't
> > > > > > > like it, you can always "re-image" your phone back to it's
> previous
> > > > > state
> > > > > > > including all preferences and wallpapers that you have se
> >
> >
> >
> > --
> >
> >
> > ---------
> > Brian
>
> --
>
> Bryan G. Seitz
>

Reply via email to