Yes. When Memtest86 development halted several years back, Memtest86+ was born, starting with the same codebase. Memtest86 dev has since restarted, but I still tend to prefer the + version, as it seems to be more responsive to new hardware, etc.
> -----Original Message----- > From: [email protected] [mailto:hardware- > [email protected]] On Behalf Of FORC5 > Sent: Thursday, January 27, 2011 8:05 AM > To: [email protected] > Subject: Re: [H] Memtest86+ 4.20 Released ! > > is Memtest86+ different ppl then Memtest86 ? > > fp > > At 09:59 PM 1/24/2011, Stan Zaske Poked the stick with: > > >Memtest86+ 4.20 is available ! This new version adds full support for > >Intel Sandy Bridge CPU (Core i5/i7 2000) and AMD "Fusion" CPU (AMD APU > >E-Series). A new failsafe mode has been added in order to allow > >Memtest86+ to run properly on unreleased hardware. You just have to > >press F1 at startup. Here is the complete changelog : > > > >Memtest86+ V4.20 changelog > >-------------------------- > > - Added failsafe mode (F1 at startup) > > - Added support for Intel "Sandy Bridge" CPU > > - Added support for AMD "fusion" CPU > > - Added Coreboot "table forward" support > > - Corrected some memory brand not detected > > - Various bug fixes > > > >Thanks to all betatesters & contributors ! > > > >Download is available at http://www.memtest.org Official Forum : > >http://forum.memtest.org > > > >Best Regards, > >__________________ > >Samuel DEMEULEMEESTER > >http://www.memtest.org > >[email protected] > > > >-- > >Using Opera's revolutionary email client: http://www.opera.com/mail/ > > > >__________ Information from ESET Smart Security, version of virus > >signature database 5818 (20110125) __________ > > > >The message was checked by ESET Smart Security. > > > >http://www.eset.com > > > > > > -- > Tallyho ! ]:8) > Taglines below ! > -- > Two writes don't make a novel.
