I don't know. The talk is that the flaw is about data integrity after some use. Sent via BlackBerry by AT&T
-----Original Message----- From: "Anthony Q. Martin" <[email protected]> Sender: [email protected] Date: Mon, 31 Jan 2011 16:05:13 To: <[email protected]> Reply-To: [email protected] Subject: Re: [H] Intel hit with chipset design flaw in Sandy Bridge rollout What is SSD caching? That's all there that is possibly important to me. On 1/31/2011 2:26 PM, Stan Zaske wrote: > Looks like this is the chipset to wait for for SB PC's. > > > At CES I spoke with Intel at length about the frustrating nature of > the P67/H67 feature segmentation. The fact that there's no chipset > that will let you use Intel's processor graphics and overclock your > CPU is a major oversight. Intel's Z68 chipset will address this > shortcoming, as well as add additional features (e.g. SSD caching) > that are exclusive to Z68. I am disappointed that Intel wasn't better > prepared on the chipset side at the SNB launch and today's > announcement is icing on the cake. If you're going to have to wait to > buy anyway I would recommend waiting until Z68 motherboards hit the > market. > > > > On Mon, 31 Jan 2011 12:19:07 -0600, Anthony Q. Martin > <[email protected]> wrote: > >> More details from Anandtech: >> >> http://www.anandtech.com/show/4142/intel-discovers-bug-in-6series-chipset-begins-recall >> >> >> >> > >
