Oh so DITTO!
Duncan
On 01/31/2011 23:53, Stan Zaske wrote:
As complex as modern PC architecture is, my hat's off to all the
Electrical Engineers that create this stuff to work so reliably.
Amazing the advancements we've seen over the past 15 years.
On Mon, 31 Jan 2011 16:21:56 -0600, Greg Sevart <[email protected]> wrote:
Given that I'm running it on the bench for a few weeks anyway, and
it's the
Intel 3gb/s ports only that are affected, it doesn't much bother me. I'd
rather they own up to it sooner than wait for failures to actually be
encountered. Supposedly, no end-user has complained about a failure
of this
nature yet--it was one of Intel's customers (ie: Dell, HP, Asus,
Gigabyte,
etc).
Real question will be how Asus will handle it. If I'm without a board
for
upwards of a month, it will leave me a bit sour--but against Asus, not
Intel.
-----Original Message-----
From: [email protected] [mailto:hardware-
[email protected]] On Behalf Of Bryan Seitz
Sent: Monday, January 31, 2011 3:56 PM
To: [email protected]
Subject: Re: [H] Intel hit with chipset design flaw in Sandy Bridge
rollout
I lol @ the early adopters :)
On Mon, Jan 31, 2011 at 11:31:22AM -0600, Greg Sevart wrote:
> >From what I can tell, yes, all series 6 chipsets are affected.
>
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: [email protected] [mailto:hardware-
> > [email protected]] On Behalf Of Gary
> > Sent: Monday, January 31, 2011 11:28 AM
> > To: [email protected]
> > Subject: Re: [H] Intel hit with chipset design flaw in Sandy Bridge
> rollout
> >
> > > The processor is fine--the issue is in the chipset. They are
-all-
> > impacted;
> > > new silicon will not be available until February. It also appears
> > > to be a longevity related problem.
> > >
> >
> > So both the P67 and the H67?
>
>
--
Bryan G. Seitz
