Works great till you tell them their internet access is through the cloud.
Then they think it the same term and it's not. Should simply BR called
remote storage and it's been done for years without a stupid buzzword.
On Mar 31, 2011 8:16 AM, "Anthony Q. Martin" <[email protected]> wrote:
> Nothing wrong with the word cloud. Lay people don't speak server.
>
> On 3/31/2011 11:05 AM, Bryan Seitz wrote:
>> The word cloud is retarded, let's just call it on a server via the
internet, thanks.
>>
>> On Thu, Mar 31, 2011 at 05:51:30AM -0400, Brian Weeden wrote:
>>> And if you have a fire in your home?
>>>
>>> The whole point of a proper cloud system for backup is that your data is
>>> synced locally AND in the cloud. That prevents complete loss in the case
of
>>> a failure in your house and also allows you to access the data without
an
>>> internet connection.
>>>
>>> ---
>>> Brian
>>>
>>>
>>> On Wed, Mar 30, 2011 at 8:57 PM, DSinc<[email protected]> wrote:
>>>
>>>> Thane,
>>>> I remain with you. Me and my NAS, and, multiple flash drives will truck
on.
>>>> Best,
>>>> Duncan
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> On 03/30/2011 20:13, Thane Sherrington wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> At 06:13 PM 30/03/2011, Bino Gopal wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>> Really? Excepy for the lack of decent upload speeds-have you tried
>>>>>> uploading 5GB all at once to share something with a friend...not
until 10+
>>>>>> Mbps is the easily accessible standard will we see the end of USB
flash
>>>>>> drives methinks! :P
>>>>>>
>>>>> Plus the whole security issue. And the fact that internet connections
go
>>>>> down or don't exist in some places. I think I'll keep my flash drive
for a
>>>>> bit longer. :)
>>>>>
>>>>> T
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
