It is a rev 3 I ensured that I waited for the fix prior to getting the
board.
On Dec 10, 2011 11:40 AM, "Anthony Q. Martin" <[email protected]> wrote:

> Which mobo did you say that was?  P67?  It is a revision 3.0 with the
> fixed Sata3 ports or one before without the revision?
>
> On 12/10/2011 12:05 PM, Gary Hunter wrote:
>
>> Thanks. The machine stayed on all night which maybe is pointing to the
>> Intel controller. I do like the look of those round cables though so I am
>> glad I asked :-)
>>
>>
>>
>> On Sat, Dec 10, 2011 at 5:35 AM, Anthony Q. Martin<[email protected]>**
>> wrote:
>>
>>  I have these round 18" sata 6gb/s round cables.  I like them but I can't
>>> speak to their quality other than to say they work.
>>>
>>> http://www.amazon.com/OKGEAR-****SUPER-OK18A3RK11-round-**<http://www.amazon.com/OKGEAR-**SUPER-OK18A3RK11-round-**>
>>> straight/dp/B005XC9Y84/ref=sr_****1_fkmr1_1?ie=UTF8&qid=**
>>> 1323524083&sr=8-1-fkmr1<http:/**/www.amazon.com/OKGEAR-SUPER-**
>>> OK18A3RK11-round-straight/dp/**B005XC9Y84/ref=sr_1_fkmr1_1?**
>>> ie=UTF8&qid=1323524083&sr=8-1-**fkmr1<http://www.amazon.com/OKGEAR-SUPER-OK18A3RK11-round-straight/dp/B005XC9Y84/ref=sr_1_fkmr1_1?ie=UTF8&qid=1323524083&sr=8-1-fkmr1>
>>> >
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> On 12/10/2011 1:04 AM, Gary Hunter wrote:
>>>
>>>  Hi,
>>>>
>>>> I am having intermittent lock-ups on my machine and it seems to be when
>>>> it
>>>> is doing some disk i/o. I have updated all drivers and am running
>>>> nothing
>>>> but essential services and it still occurs so want to ensure it is not
>>>> any
>>>> of the SATA cables before exploring other controller errors. So I want
>>>> to
>>>> first  replace the cables with something very good quality and reliable.
>>>> Any recommendations on top quality SATA cables capable of 6Gb/s
>>>> preferably
>>>> with the locking mechanism. There are so many options out there I don't
>>>> know where to start and I don't just want to buy the most expensive as
>>>> cost
>>>> can't be relied on to determine quality :-)
>>>>
>>>> Many thanks,
>>>>
>>>> Gary
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>

Reply via email to