Why don't you paste the results in?
Is this a machine that's been operating for a while? Could it have the
wrong HAL (uniprocessor instead of multi-processor)? Can you try a WinPE
environment and see what coreinfo shows there, or a Linux bootable ISO
and see what /proc/cpuinfo shows?
Personally, I'm inclined to think it's an OS issue instead of the
processor - the chances of just the right failure happening to kill one
core seems remote to me.
Jamie
As an example, here's the coreinfo processor info from my laptop
(i7-2760, 4 cores with hyperthreading):
Logical to Physical Processor Map:
**------ Physical Processor 0 (Hyperthreaded)
--**---- Physical Processor 1 (Hyperthreaded)
----**-- Physical Processor 2 (Hyperthreaded)
------** Physical Processor 3 (Hyperthreaded)
Logical Processor to Socket Map:
******** Socket 0
Logical Processor to NUMA Node Map:
******** NUMA Node 0
Logical Processor to Cache Map:
**------ Data Cache 0, Level 1, 32 KB, Assoc 8, LineSize 64
**------ Instruction Cache 0, Level 1, 32 KB, Assoc 8, LineSize 64
**------ Unified Cache 0, Level 2, 256 KB, Assoc 8, LineSize 64
--**---- Data Cache 1, Level 1, 32 KB, Assoc 8, LineSize 64
--**---- Instruction Cache 1, Level 1, 32 KB, Assoc 8, LineSize 64
--**---- Unified Cache 1, Level 2, 256 KB, Assoc 8, LineSize 64
----**-- Data Cache 2, Level 1, 32 KB, Assoc 8, LineSize 64
----**-- Instruction Cache 2, Level 1, 32 KB, Assoc 8, LineSize 64
----**-- Unified Cache 2, Level 2, 256 KB, Assoc 8, LineSize 64
------** Data Cache 3, Level 1, 32 KB, Assoc 8, LineSize 64
------** Instruction Cache 3, Level 1, 32 KB, Assoc 8, LineSize 64
------** Unified Cache 3, Level 2, 256 KB, Assoc 8, LineSize 64
******** Unified Cache 4, Level 3, 6 MB, Assoc 12, LineSize 64
Logical Processor to Group Map:
******** Group 0
On 2012-09-18 10:00 AM, DSinc wrote:
Al,
Ran coreinfo.exe this am. From what I see, it says that only Core #0
is operational.
So, bios 1102 says 2 cores present during bootup.
Coreinfo.exe says Core #0 is running,
cpuid v159 says 'only 1 core,'
hwmon v1.20 says 'Core 0 is 39C',and,
windows task manager says '..only 1 core is working.'
Fine.
I guess I now wait for my replacement C2D E8400 cpu to eliminate the Asus
P5Q3 m/b. (or, blow out a 2d E8400.................)
Am I close?
Duncan
On 09/17/2012 19:20, DSinc wrote:
Thanks Al. More reading; good project for tonight. Raining.
Duncan
On 09/17/2012 09:50, Al Anger wrote:
This page mat be helpful:
http://technet.microsoft.com/en-us/sysinternals/bb795535
especially this one:
http://technet.microsoft.com/en-us/sysinternals/cc835722
cheers,
al
DSinc wrote:
How does one separate an observation from our chosen OS?
--
Jamie Furtner <[email protected]>
