-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 thomasg wrote:
> The OMAP is a lot faster, has a lot more features and doesn't come from > a company that doesn't care about open source the slightest bit. Steady on, that OMAP device is marginally slower vs s3c6410 CPU, 600 vs 633MHz. And it's hard to say that Samsung "doesn't care about open source the slightest bit", they did go to the trouble to make the BSP available for Linux. By the time we're done with them they will have mainline support for it. OMAP has this sexy DSP business, but the Glamo has all kinds of coprocessors that will never get used. 6410 is going to make a satisfying basis for a smart device I think. - -Andy -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.9 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with Fedora - http://enigmail.mozdev.org iEYEARECAAYFAkjqelIACgkQOjLpvpq7dMrE5wCfQvF1kkfKKffkcEGV+GuHZnK+ q3sAnRshRqKbR2FQvTavSO888IVDJibc =Q83w -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- _______________________________________________ hardware mailing list [email protected] http://lists.openmoko.org/mailman/listinfo/hardware
