-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 andrzej zaborowski wrote:
> BTW It's great that Openmoko puts this much effort in having a > mainline acceptable SDK but it's very hard to catch up with the years > of support by community and vendors on OMAP meaning that every little > quirk of the hardware has been explored, especially in the power > management playground. So quality-wise it's not something that is > solved by throwing enough money at it. Well I can agree OMAP 3 has more firepower, and that we will be making 6410 device first. But I don't really see that Ben Dooks' work rewriting the 6410 BSP is going to give inherently worse results than what they have; he did mention the OMAP tree when I met him and did not seem to feel it was in great shape. The fresh implementation will at least have zero bitrot and use latest stuff. > I hope this investment doesn't tie OM further to s3c series (one of > the arguments for staying with it in gta04 was familiarity, so I just > hope this argument is not used again). We have to compare what's around by then, not what's around now, to make a decision then. If there are no other competing devices at the same level (I imagine in some months there will be) then OMAP 3 is looking good by default. - -Andy -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.9 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with Fedora - http://enigmail.mozdev.org iEYEARECAAYFAkjxvqgACgkQOjLpvpq7dMp3CACgkh8feYRJFLHL5CL3igzadaJ7 oX8An17dViTyhqVqckM/lHuBnVmeEXFu =x9PD -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- _______________________________________________ hardware mailing list [email protected] http://lists.openmoko.org/mailman/listinfo/hardware
