On Mon, Jan 10, 2011 at 1:38 PM, Deron Kazmaier <[email protected]> wrote: > I understand that. Just wondering what "advanced" features will be missing > during my exploring, and how critical it will be for my purposes (I realize > you can't answer the second). I understate that if required, I'll create my > own functions. > > Do you think anyone would be interested in such a fall back? I can do it > within my own framework, or make something more standalone, but don't see > the need for the later if no one else would be interested.
The "old" harfbuzz has a "contrib" directory containing implementations of some Unicode functions used by the Chromium browser on Linux. http://cgit.freedesktop.org/harfbuzz.old/tree/contrib With more insight into how everything fits together, I think this was a mistake; we actually have ICU available and didn't need to duplicate the data tables. (And it has pieces like a "reverse" script run iterator which is the wrong way of doing things.) _______________________________________________ HarfBuzz mailing list [email protected] http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/harfbuzz
