Dear Behdad, I try it right away.Thank you so much. Best Regards, Scott
> Date: Wed, 18 Sep 2013 11:44:05 -0400 > From: [email protected] > To: [email protected] > CC: [email protected]; [email protected] > Subject: Re: [HarfBuzz] I wonder why glyph 'uni0647' is not substituted with > the one at 0xFEE9('uni06BE.fina') in Tahoma font > > You can also try with my DLL from: > > http://www.freedesktop.org/software/harfbuzz/release/harfbuzz-0.9.21-win32.zip > > On 13-09-18 11:34 AM, Su Scott wrote: > > Hi Graham > > > > Thanks for your kindly suggestion. > > I am still struggling with this issue, > > Mind if you send me a copy of your win32 bundle version? > > I wanna compare with each other for the key difference in config or setting. > > > > Thank you so much. > > > > Scott > > > > > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ > > Date: Wed, 18 Sep 2013 10:49:50 +0100 > > From: [email protected] > > To: [email protected] > > CC: [email protected] > > Subject: Re: [HarfBuzz] I wonder why glyph 'uni0647' is not substituted with > > the one at 0xFEE9('uni06BE.fina') in Tahoma font > > > > On 18/09/2013 10:32, Su Scott wrote: > > > > Thank you so much for the detail testing. > > It proves my resultis wrong. > > Hope I dig the reason out soon. > > > > ^ ^ > > > > Scott > > > > > > > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ > > <<snip lots>> > > > > > > Hi Scott > > > > Just a suggestion, but try experimenting with the glyph uni0654 between > > other > > pairs of joining characters to see if that also prevents correct shaping > > behavior. > > > > Best > > Graham > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > _______________________________________________ > > HarfBuzz mailing list > > [email protected] > > http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/harfbuzz > > > > -- > behdad > http://behdad.org/
_______________________________________________ HarfBuzz mailing list [email protected] http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/harfbuzz
