Dear Graham
Yes ! I found the missing part is that I didn't use HAVE_UCDN in
preprocessor definitions.
I got the same result after I applied it.
Thank you for your help.
Best Regards
Scott
From: [email protected]
To: [email protected]
Date: Thu, 19 Sep 2013 00:41:22 +0800
CC: [email protected]
Subject: Re: [HarfBuzz] I wonder why glyph 'uni0647' is not substituted with
the one at 0xFEE9('uni06BE.fina') in Tahoma font
Dear Graham
wow, I remember I ever visited your blog.
Thank you so much.
I'll take some time to follow your step and compare with mine.
Hope my next answer is 'Yes!' after coming holidays.
Best Regards
Scott
Date: Wed, 18 Sep 2013 17:13:40 +0100
From: [email protected]
To: [email protected]
CC: [email protected]
Subject: Re: [HarfBuzz] I wonder why glyph 'uni0647' is not substituted with
the one at 0xFEE9('uni06BE.fina') in Tahoma font
On 18/09/2013 16:34, Su Scott wrote:
Hi Graham
Thanks
for your kindly suggestion.
I
am still struggling with this issue,
Mind
if you send me a copy of your win32 bundle version?
I wanna compare with each
other for the key difference in
config or setting.
Thank you so much.
Scott
<<snip>>
Hi Scott
It's part of a much bigger build/project but I posted some very
brief notes on the files/settings I used to build HarfBuzz as a .lib
file --- and the files I excluded from my build. It's probably a bit
incomplete but, perhaps, may be useful.
See
http://www.readytext.co.uk/?p=3062
Best
Graham
_______________________________________________
HarfBuzz mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/harfbuzz
_______________________________________________
HarfBuzz mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/harfbuzz
