On 14-01-07 07:54 PM, Luis de Bethencourt wrote: > On 7 January 2014 06:50, Khaled Hosny <[email protected] > <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote: > > On Tue, Jan 07, 2014 at 06:19:37AM -0500, Luis de Bethencourt wrote: > > So my question is: what type of documentation do people in the list > want to > > see the most? > > In-line function docs in the comments that populate the gtk-docs? Or > > external documentation that explains how to use Harfbuzz? or something > else? > > I guess both, high level overview for people using HarfBuzz for first > time (and/or not very familiar with low level text layout in general) > and API documentation for more advanced users. > > Regards, > Khaled > > Yes, both is the goal for full documentation. Just wondering what would be > most beneficial to do first.
I think reference API docs are priority. That's what we ship with the package and what people look for most. High-level is nice, but we have enough pieces of code on github to refer people to. -- behdad http://behdad.org/ _______________________________________________ HarfBuzz mailing list [email protected] http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/harfbuzz
