On 7 January 2014 08:16, Werner LEMBERG <[email protected]> wrote: > > > So my question is: what type of documentation do people in the list > > want to see the most? In-line function docs in the comments that > > populate the gtk-docs? > > Each function needs a description, together with an explanation of all > parameters, return values, etc., etc. – just think of having a > HarfBuzz manpage. > > The code already is gtk-doc friendly. The docs matching objects and functions are autogenerated with --enable-gtk-doc into html and xml. The problem is that most files just have empty templates and not the actual content of the docs.
> > Or external documentation that explains how to use Harfbuzz? > > This is certainly useful, too. But I consider the `manpage' > documentation quest more important since there are already showcases > that demonstrate HarfBuzz quite well. > > > Werner >
_______________________________________________ HarfBuzz mailing list [email protected] http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/harfbuzz
