On 14-03-04 02:29 PM, Richard Wordingham wrote: > On Tue, 04 Mar 2014 10:47:47 -0800 > Behdad Esfahbod <[email protected]> wrote: > >> That negates the reason we added that line to begin with, which was >> to ensure all hb_tag_t's fit in hb_script_t. How about: >> >> _HB_SCRIPT_DUMMY1 = 0x7FFFFFFF, >> _HB_SCRIPT_DUMMY2 >> >> The idea being that DUMMY2 gets value of 0x80000000, ensuring that >> hb_script_t can represent up to 0xFFFFFFFF. > > But the value of DUMMY2 is not a value of (32-bit) int!
Read again what Jonathan wrote: """ ISO C says: Each enumerated type shall be compatible with char, a signed integer type, or an unsigned integer type. The choice of type is implementation-defined, but shall be capable of representing the values of all the members of the enumeration. which is fine, but it also says: The expression that defines the value of an enumeration constant shall be an integer constant expression that has a value representable as an int. """ _______________________________________________ HarfBuzz mailing list [email protected] http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/harfbuzz
