On 4/29/16 5:40 PM, Richard Wordingham wrote:
How does that benefit you over having the OT script kana with the rule that its lookups must be able to support Han if the latter's characters are in the font?
The existence of an agreement is of course the most important thing. 'kana' would work, but it would be confusing, and we already have 'hani' too.
I suspect that font developers who have used 'kana' will have to touch their fonts in many cases, so there may be little benefit in trying to extend 'kana'.
(If I were one of those, I would seriously consider putting all the features under the DFLT script)
Eric. _______________________________________________ HarfBuzz mailing list [email protected] https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/harfbuzz
