On Fri, Mar 30, 2018 at 4:15 PM, Nathan Willis <nwil...@glyphography.com> wrote:
> On Thu, Mar 29, 2018 at 6:57 PM, Behdad Esfahbod <beh...@behdad.org> > wrote: > >> >> Other sequences still can combine. Just not as character composition, but >> font-level glyph substitutions and positioning. >> > > Right; I get that -- that's what the *jmo GSUBs do. Maybe I didn't express > my question correctly. I'll try again.... > > The Jamo block contains: > - Modern Ls > - Old Ls > - fillers > - Modern Vs > - Old Vs > - Modern Ts > - Old Ts > Does it? I don't know. > If the rule was that only <Modern,Modern,Modern> would compose into > something in the Syllables block, that would make total sense to me. But > the comment makes it sound like <Old,Old,Modern> also maps to stuff in the > Syllables block and that it's only the Old Ts that are excluded. That's > what I don't understand. > Sounds like a question for Unicode archaeologists. Or rather, why did the national standards that Unicode imported included such precomposed sequences and not others. > Nate > > > -- > nathan.p.willis > nwil...@glyphography.com <http://identi.ca/n8> > -- behdad http://behdad.org/
_______________________________________________ HarfBuzz mailing list HarfBuzz@lists.freedesktop.org https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/harfbuzz
