I see. You are right. Fixed the comment. On Sat, Mar 31, 2018 at 3:33 AM, Richard Wordingham < richard.wording...@ntlworld.com> wrote:
> On Fri, 30 Mar 2018 18:15:13 -0500 > Nathan Willis <nwil...@glyphography.com> wrote: > > > If the rule was that only <Modern,Modern,Modern> would compose into > > something in the Syllables block, that would make total sense to me. > > But the comment makes it sound like <Old,Old,Modern> also maps to > > stuff in the Syllables block and that it's only the Old Ts that are > > excluded. That's what I don't understand. > > The comment is explaining which <LV,T> combinations compose at the > character level. I think you will find that LV combinations only exist > for <Modern,Modern> combinations. It is at that level that > <Old,Old,Modern> is excluded. > > What you seem to be after is a change to the text on line 1154 from > > "Only the <L,V> sequences for the 11xx ranges combine." > > to > > "Only the <L,V> sequences for parts of the 11xx ranges combine." > > or > > "Only the <L,V> sequences for some L and some V combine." > > The interesting bit of Unicode history is why the consortium caved in > to Korean demands for the full set of <modern, modern, modern> to be > included. An uninteresting bit of HarfBuzz archaeology would be > whether someone briefly thought that the all L and V in the Hangul Jamo > block composed at the character level. > > Richard. > > > > > > > _______________________________________________ > HarfBuzz mailing list > HarfBuzz@lists.freedesktop.org > https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/harfbuzz > -- behdad http://behdad.org/
_______________________________________________ HarfBuzz mailing list HarfBuzz@lists.freedesktop.org https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/harfbuzz
