Matt, Yep. +1.
-- dims On 5/12/05, Matt Benson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > --- Mladen Turk <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Davanum Srinivas wrote: > [SNIP] > > You missed the point. JVM without class library is > > not J2SE. It is > > only JVM. Is the intention to build a JVM or J2SE > > compatible project? > > > > AFAICT, one of the goals is to pass the TCK's, so > > how can you do that > > if you don't have a full control over the major part > > of the package? > > > > Using the GNU Classpath or what ever *ANY* external > > library is just > > a feature, not a part of the product itself (at > > least not an J2SE > > compatible product). > > > > RE GNU Classpath: If licensing issues pan out (and I'm > honestly not sure what the issues _are_ based on my > "IANAL" interpretation of the much-discussed > "exception clause"), what's to stop Harmony developers > (gasp) contributing code directly to Classpath if > there are TCK issues? > > -Matt > > > __________________________________ > Yahoo! Mail Mobile > Take Yahoo! Mail with you! Check email on your mobile phone. > http://mobile.yahoo.com/learn/mail > -- Davanum Srinivas - http://webservices.apache.org/~dims/
