We shouldl design in such a way that , we should get some interfacing/bootstrapping issues in C (can be C++ but i think due to its direct linking to natives C will be prefered i can present more argo over it though ;) ) and then come back to java again until we feel ctuck some where (though what my experiance suggest and i have looked it into the presented projects, we can get rid of those concerete walls if any one we have to have face in the running of time ) so what i am saying i m summing it up write in java using C. java provides us all those features which we need to go to this road , from the management, maintianbility and other stuffs (i m not writting SE book though ha ha ha) u all knows better. so what u think comment ? On 5/18/05, Panagiotis Astithas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Ben Laurie wrote: > > Mark Brooks wrote: > > > >>> C++, just C++, is a recipe for trouble. Most projects that use it > >>> define a > >>> subset to make development a less painfull talk. Usually operator > >>> overloading, templates and virtual inheritance are discarded. > >>> > >>> Rodrigo > >> > >> > >> > >> Agreed. If the decision is to go with C++, it will need to be a > >> subset of C++ for sanity. I still think that, at most, a minimal C > >> kernel and the rest in Java is a better option. > >> > >>> > As I said before, don't assume we're all Java fans here. I'm far > more > >>> > familiar with C++ than I am with Java. > >>> > >>>> <snip> > >>> > >>> > >>> > > >>> > Ben. > >> > >> > >> > >> If you aren't a Java fan, why are you interested in Harmony? Or am I > >> misinterpreting what you meant there? > > > > > > Surely I don't have to rate Java as the best language for everything in > > order to be interested in Harmony? I don't think HTTP or SSL are the > > best ways to do things, either, but I've spent an enormous amount of > > time on both of them. > > > > There's all sorts of reasons I'm interested in Harmony. > > > > a) I recently tried Eclipse, and discovered it removed a major source of > > Java irritation (excessive amounts of redundant typing). In fact, I love > > Eclipse. If only I could get it working on FreeBSD :-) > > Since the java/eclipse port is working fine, I assume you want to use it > with another JVM than java/jdk14? If so, and since this is something I > was contemplating these days, under which JVM would you want to use it? > Kaffe? GCJ? JC? JikesRVM? > > -- > Panagiotis Astithas > EBS, Electronic Business Systems Ltd. > 18 Evgenidou Street, 115 25, Athens GREECE > Phone: +30 210 674 7631 > Fax: +30 210 674 7601 > http://www.ebs.gr >
-- Usman Bashir Certified IBM XML Solution Developer Certified UML Developer Brainbench Certified Internet Perfessional[advance](BCIP) Brainbench Certified Java Perfessional (BCJP) Brainbench Certified .NET Perfessional Brainbench Ceritified C++ Perfessional (BCCP) Software engineer IT24 Faculty Member Operation Badar Lahore
