On Dec 2, 2005, at 9:13 AM, Anthony Green wrote:
On Thu, 2005-12-01 at 10:47 -0800, Dalibor Topic wrote:
Yup. I think dual licensing with the LGPL should be sufficient for
that to happen,
and get us rolling forward in that aspect as well.
Rather than dual license the code, maybe switching to LGPL+exception
would be better. The GNU FOO+exception licenses say that you can
redistribute using the FOO license at will.
But what would be the point of a relicensing effort like this?
AFAICT,
many people here show no interest in collaborating on a single free
class library project.
But others do, so if we can use both, we can give people the choice
to work on what they want, and users to use what they want.
geir
--
Geir Magnusson Jr +1-203-665-6437
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
