DNS timeouts are usually quite high ... of the order of 30-60 seconds so a number of these could possibly add up to 10 minutes. Given the meaningful test name (I wont join that discussion yet!) then this seems like quite a likely source of problems.
Regards, Mark. On 4/14/06, Geir Magnusson Jr <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > what could it possibly be doing for 10 minutes? > > Stepan Mishura wrote: > > Mikhail, you missed the champion! > > I've just look to the generated test report: total time is 1143.767 and time > > for > > tests.api.java.net.Inet6AddressTest.test_getByNameLjava_lang_String is > > 645.167!!! > > > > I'd exclude this test to speed up test suite run in 2 times. > > > > Thanks, > > Stepan. > > > > On 4/12/06, Mikhail Loenko wrote: > >> Top 12 winners out of 758 tests (1.6%) according to junit report > >> take 458 sec out of 572 (80%) > >> > >> The winners are: > >> > >> IdentityScopeTest 112.031 > >> IdentityTest 85.233 > >> Inet6AddressTest 57.944 > >> NTLoginModuleTest 55.199 > >> OutOfMemoryErrorTest 30.724 > >> SignatureTest 26.859 > >> ObjectTest 19.148 > >> ThreadGroupTest 18.878 > >> DatagramChannelTest 14.852 > >> SocketChannelTest 14.171 > >> TimerTest 12.408 > >> KeyPairGenerator3Test 10.405 > >> > >> Thanks, > >> Mikhail > >> > >> 2006/4/12, Mikhail Loenko <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > >>> I've fixed tests that change security manager and set of providers, > >>> now the fork mode for the security tests is "once", run time reduced > >>> by ~7 minutes. > >>> > >>> So now there are other champions, should we go through them and > >>> reduce/exclude/move to another suite? > >>> > >>> Thanks, > >>> Mikhail > >>> > >>> 2006/4/11, Mark Hindess <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > >>>> Personally, obviously, I'd expect people to run the tests before > >> committing. > >>>> However, I notice that since enabling the security tests - which fork > >>>> for every test - that the tests take over half an hour to run now on > >>>> our Linux build machine. So I can see why enthusiasm might lead to > >>>> people not running all the tests but instead perhaps just running > >>>> those from the module you are changing. > >>>> > >>>> George just commented in a commit message backing out some changes in > >>>> text that all the text tests passed even though the changed caused > >>>> failures elsewhere. > >>>> > >>>> Regards, > >>>> Mark. > > > > [SNIP] > > > > ----------------------------------------------------------- > > Terms of use : http://incubator.apache.org/harmony/mailing.html > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > Thanks, > > Stepan Mishura > > Intel Middleware Products Division > > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > Terms of use : http://incubator.apache.org/harmony/mailing.html > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > -- Mark Hindess <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> IBM Java Technology Centre, UK. --------------------------------------------------------------------- Terms of use : http://incubator.apache.org/harmony/mailing.html To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
