On 10/13/06, Geir Magnusson Jr. <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Derby has VM-specific features? No. Seems the VM has some special bug... Leo Li wrote: > Hi, Sian: > After some study, I found that it is necessary to treat j9 > seperately,....mmm about security and vm library loader. I have not spot > the > precise place. > I think we have first to get a wrapper jvm class like j9_13 derby gives > but not other standard wrapper class. Then we have to rewrite it java > command-line as "java" but not "j9". Am I all right? > Besides, it will be helpful if you can post your patch of Derby on the > http://wiki.apache.org/harmony/Apache_Derby.:) > Thank you. > > > > On 10/12/06, Sian January <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> >> Hi Leo, >> >> I have previously run the Derby tests on Harmony with the IBM VME (see >> the >> Wiki page - http://wiki.apache.org/harmony/Apache_Derby). I had to make >> some changes to Derby to get it to run, but from reading the bug >> report it >> sounds like you found a way round it too. If not then let me know and I >> could send you a patch or post one here or something. I wasn't using >> DRLVM >> so I haven't seen the bug you're describing. Running with the IBM VME I >> got >> 82% of the tests passing. I looked at some of the test failures but not >> in >> very much depth. However some of them seemed to be because the different >> VMs had differently formatted output, so not necessarily a bug. I think >> that's one of the reasons why the tests need to know what VM they are >> using. The tests have different output files for different VMs that they >> compare with the actual output for each test. >> >> Just as a side point, several people have looked at applications in the >> past >> including myself and have posted the results on the Wiki ( >> http://wiki.apache.org/harmony/Application_Status). So if anyone is >> having >> a problem running a particular application it might be worth having a >> look >> to check if someone has done it before. Or we could suggest that >> everyone >> posts this kind of thing to the mailing list in future if that's more >> likely >> to be found. >> >> Regards, >> >> Sian >> >> >> >> On 12/10/06, Leo Li <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> > >> > Hi, all: >> > I now plan to make the self-host of Derby on Harmony. >> > Is there anyone interested in this topic? >> > >> > Here is what I encountered in the process. Hope it will be helpful >> to >> > anybody who is interested in it. >> > >> > At first, the testcases even fails on RI both on windows and ubuntu >> > and >> > the result are different.??? >> > After some struggiling, I have successfully passed the provided >> > testcases on RI after I rebuild the source on my machine. >> > But there still remains a problem: >> > The derby team kindly rewrite the launcher for testcases in >> order to >> > treat J9 vm differently if the property java.vm.name starts with "j9". >> But >> > the j9 vm used in Harmony has been customized thus is different from >> > traditional j9 vm that is expected by derby. This leads to failure to >> > launch >> > tests. >> > I will talk on Derby's mailing list to find a solution. >> > >> > -- >> > Leo Li >> > China Software Development Lab, IBM >> > >> > >> >> >> -- >> Sian January >> >> IBM Java Technology Centre, UK >> >> > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- Terms of use : http://incubator.apache.org/harmony/mailing.html To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
-- Leo Li China Software Development Lab, IBM
