On Friday 13 October 2006 11:37 Egor Pasko wrote: > I am OK with all. Some comments: > * we should explicitly say that it is a GNU make. > * the more restrictive GCC, the better. What is the most restrictive > now? gcc-4.1? > > P.S.: I personally like diversity in tool chains. Let's make a single > configuration not a must, but a matter of priority. So, we can > consider achieving good results on these two toolchains as the first > priority and fix bugs there first. Not because there should be only > one, but because there should be at least one. > > Does it feel comfortable to everyone?
Well written. I Agree. +1 Gcc 4.1.1 is a correction to 4.1.0, so I think we can state 4.1.x. > On the 0x201 day of Apache Harmony Weldon Washburn wrote: > > My tools are: > > > > - WindowsXP > > - MSVS .NET 2003 > > - ant-1.6.5 > > - Sun JDK 1.5.0_07_b03 > > > > - Linux > > - gcc 3.4.5 > > - ant-1.6.5 > > - IBM JDK 1.5.0_08_b03 > > - make 3.8.0 > > > > How about the following first stab at Geir's idea of "will work" tool > > chains? The idea is to quickly converge the below so that I can call a > > vote on it. > > > > -WindowsXP on laptop, Windows Server 2003 on servers > > - MSVS .NET 2003 > > - ant-1.6.5 > > - Java JDK 1.5.0_xxxx > > > > - Linux > > - gcc 3.4.xxx or higher > > - ant-1.6.5 > > - Java JDK 1.5.0_xxxx > > - make 3.8.0 or higher > > > > On 10/12/06, Pavel Ozhdikhin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > To update the statistics, my tools: > > > > > > - MS Windows Server 2003 / IA32: > > > MSVS .NET 2003 > > > ant-1.6.5 > > > JRockit JDK 1.5.0_03 > > > > > > - Linux / IA32: > > > gcc 3.3.3 > > > GNU make 3.80 > > > ant-1.6.5 > > > JRockit JDK 1.5.0 > > > > > > Thanks, > > > Pavel > > > > > > On 10/10/06, Geir Magnusson Jr. <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > I'm so sick of this gcc problem. > > > > > > > > Lets decide on the versions for GCC and other tools that "will work". > > > > I feel the same way that mark does re that being able to build on > > > > multiple versions gives a better feeling of goodness and harmony in > > > > the universe and I encourage people to work on other versions (I > > > > will), but it's gotta be the case that we have a "reference > > > > toolchain" - that no matter what, it will work on there, and probably > > > > a list of tested versions > > > > > > > > So, what tools and what versions are people working with ? here's a > > > > partial list of mine : > > > > > > > > 1) WinXP : Visual Studio .NET 2003 > > > > > > > > 2) Linux x86 : > > > > GCC : 3.4.6 > > > > g++ : 3.4.6 > > > > make : 3.81b4 > > > > > > > > What are you using? what other tools should we list? > > > > > > > > I recently setup a new machine (linux) and now have the complete list > > > > of stuff that has to be installed (starting from fresh ubuntu6) and > > > > will post that on the getting started document on teh website. > > > > > > > > > > > > geir > > > > > > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > > > > Terms of use : http://incubator.apache.org/harmony/mailing.html > > > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > For additional commands, e-mail: > > > > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > > > Terms of use : http://incubator.apache.org/harmony/mailing.html > > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > -- > > Weldon Washburn > > Intel Middleware Products Division -- Gregory Shimansky, Intel Middleware Products Division --------------------------------------------------------------------- Terms of use : http://incubator.apache.org/harmony/mailing.html To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
