No strong feeling either way -- but sure, sounds reasonable. Regards, Tim
Geir Magnusson Jr. wrote: > I was thinking about the recent IPF thread, and was going to add a > "DRLVM-IPF" category so we can track things easier. > > But this is dumb - there are other things for porting, like stuff in > classlib and the launcher tools (maybe). > > Anyway, how does "Port-<platform>" sound as a pattern? so in this case, > "Port - IPF" > > geir > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > Terms of use : http://incubator.apache.org/harmony/mailing.html > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > -- Tim Ellison ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) IBM Java technology centre, UK. --------------------------------------------------------------------- Terms of use : http://incubator.apache.org/harmony/mailing.html To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
