On 10/20/06, Geir Magnusson Jr. wrote:

For those that haven't been following along....

Graduating from the Incubator is a "dynamic" process, as there's no
really hard and fast rules to satisfy.  On one hand, this is a good
thing, because determining the health and prospect of future success of
an Apache community is a difficult job, and it therefore relies on the
experience and judgment of the Incubator PMC members.  (It also allows
the process to be adapted for different kinds of podlings - we're a
weird one...) On the other hand, it can result it individual Incubator
PMC members using different "filter" criterion.

Now, I'm really proud to be a part of this community - I think we work
very well together, collaboratively, in a positive and friendly
atmosphere, and have demonstrated time and again the ability to vote,
deal with issues that arise in voting, deal with differences of opinion,
amass great hunks of software into an orderly project, etc.

That said, I'm not very optimistic that we'll be able to bring this to a
close in time for this month's board meeting.  It's a shame, but that's
ok - we're really in no rush, and if not this month, then next month.
There are no major problems - it's partially because of the rather short
timelines we tried, and partially because there are a few issues under
discussion on the general@incubator.apache.org list, a list I encourage
all of you to subscribe to and participate in.

First, there are minor 'nits' here and there related to license and
license headers.  For example, we're missing the antlr license in our
NOTICE file.  Patch anyone?  Also, there are other minor things here and
there which can be found with this tool :

    http://code.google.com/p/arat/

Anyone interested in running it ASAP and giving us a set of patches to
get a clean bill of health?

Second, we're having a discussion on the general@ list (in which we all
can participate) regarding the necessity of a project going through a
release.  This isn't actually an Incubator requirement, but the case
where information on community health and dynamics is absent or scarce,
it's a reasonable exercise.

However... for Harmony, that isn't the case. I've been arguing that
there's plenty of information on us.  All four of us mentors (Stefano,
Leo, Dims and myself) reported very positive independent assessments of
the community (go read on general@) and we have 18 months of consistent,
positive interaction with each other. My thinking was that

1) A release is something that we haven't wanted to do yet as a project,
as our interest is in producing a more complete and stable
implementation first.  We have a roadmap, it's been published for a
while now, and at least for me, it's the goal that I'm looking towards
every day.  (heck... we're still deciding what "supported" means...)

2) We're not stable enough to do something we want to shout out to the
world as a "developer release" or similar.  We will be ready soon, but
not now.  (This is just my personal opinion - others may certainly
differ...)

Anyway, that's what I feel about it.  There are Incubator PMC members
that have decided that there is ample information (Dims, Stefano and Leo
really hit it out of the park with their assessments... thanks guys!)
and have changed their minds, and I'm hoping to reach consensus with the
rest that there *is* enough information.

However, if not, and some IPMC memebers still really want to see a
demonstration of a release process, we can certainly do that.  I've
thought about what we might release.  One thing that came to mind is a
Pack200 jar :)



I was under impression that you are against releasing "a piece of Harmony"
[1]. Particularly, you wrote: "There no sense in releasing just a
classlibrary or a virtual machine.  Or a toolset.  You need the whole pile."


IIUC now it is OK to release harmony-ketool-v1.0.tar.gz. Right?

Thanks,
Stepan.

[1]
http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/incubator-harmony-dev/200609.mbox/[EMAIL
 PROTECTED]

Any other ideas, and any other thoughts?

geir



------------------------------------------------------
Terms of use : http://incubator.apache.org/harmony/mailing.html
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to