--- robert burrell donkin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On 10/23/06, Matt Benson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > wrote: > > --- "Geir Magnusson Jr." <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > [SNIP] > > wrt this particular "nit", antlr 2.x.x versions > are > > public domain...>
> the public domain has become difficult in recent > times. in some > jurisdictions (in europe), i believe that an > explicit license is > required. (yes, i know it's daft.) copyright may > also now be primarily > criminal matter between the state and the copier. > the opinions of the > author matter little. so, it's best to include the > statement. > > and a note to the notice file to acknowledge Terence > :-) FWIW, when ANTLR3 is fully baked, these issues will be easier as it's under a sane and relatively easy-to-interpret BSD license as compared to "custom OSS or PD license." :) -Matt > > - robert > __________________________________________________ Do You Yahoo!? Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around http://mail.yahoo.com
