On 11/7/06, Ivan Volosyuk <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

On 07 Nov 2006 14:35:55 +0600, Egor Pasko <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > I already have one idea how to benefit from movable vtables.


There would have to be a very compelling argument for making vtables
movable.  Like a business workload that Harmony needs to run within the next
12 months.


> in GCV4.1? :)

Yes

--
Ivan
Intel Enterprise Solutions Software Division




--
Weldon Washburn
Intel Enterprise Solutions Software Division

Reply via email to