On 11/8/06, Geir Magnusson Jr. <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Weldon Washburn wrote: > On 11/7/06, Ivan Volosyuk <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> >> On 07 Nov 2006 14:35:55 +0600, Egor Pasko <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> > > I already have one idea how to benefit from movable vtables. > > > There would have to be a very compelling argument for making vtables > movable. Like a business workload that Harmony needs to run within the > next > 12 months. How would a business workload need this directly?
That's the point. I can't figure out any compelling story for moving vtables. As far as I can tell, its over-engineering. I would love to be proven wrong. geir
-- Weldon Washburn Intel Enterprise Solutions Software Division
