> -----Original Message----- > From: [email protected] [mailto:haskell-art- > [email protected]] On Behalf Of Henning Thielemann > Sent: Tuesday, January 04, 2011 6:19 AM > To: [email protected] > Cc: Winograd-Cort; [email protected]; Donya Quick > Subject: Re: [haskell-art] [Haskell-cafe] Lazy cons, Stream-Fusion style?
> In the meantime I am more and more moving to Arrows or Arrow like > structures. On the one hand it is often the more appropriate data > structure since it models exactly the causality of signal processes and > has much less risk for memory leaks (compared to lazy lists). On the > other hand it is sad, that Arrows often need more type tricks in order > to work and that with arrows I am forced more or less to pointfree > style. I almost always use one of the arrow preprocessor syntaxes, which at least give the illusion of not being point-free. > I like pointfree style for simple chains of operations but I do > not like it for diamond-like graphs, i.e. re-use the result of one > signal process multiple times. But this seems easy using arrow syntax -- am I missing something? -Paul _______________________________________________ haskell-art mailing list [email protected] http://lists.lurk.org/mailman/listinfo/haskell-art
