> a < b < c
>    which is a short-cut of a < b \land b < c

The confusion between f(x) and Îx.f(x) is indeed a real bummer.
OTOH I like the a<b<c shorthand because it's both "obvious" and unambiguous
(as long as the return value of < can't be passed as an argument to <, which
is typically the case when the return value is boolean and there's no
ordering defined on booleans).


        Stefan

_______________________________________________
Haskell-Cafe mailing list
Haskell-Cafe@haskell.org
http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/haskell-cafe

Reply via email to