On 2005-01-29, Stefan Monnier <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> a < b < c >> which is a short-cut of a < b \land b < c > > The confusion between f(x) and ?x.f(x) is indeed a real bummer. > OTOH I like the a<b<c shorthand because it's both "obvious" and unambiguous > (as long as the return value of < can't be passed as an argument to <, which > is typically the case when the return value is boolean and there's no > ordering defined on booleans).
Of course, it _is_ defined on Bools in Haskell, with True > False. But see Martin's answer. -- Aaron Denney -><- _______________________________________________ Haskell-Cafe mailing list Haskell-Cafe@haskell.org http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/haskell-cafe
