On 1/13/13 12:44 PM, Alexander Solla wrote:
Hask is a very rich category, and is suitable for encoding a lot (but not
all) of category theory.  As far as I know, the actual boundary is as yet
unknown.

I'm not sure that's the most appropriate way to render things. In general, rich categories like CCCs and Toposes are "good places" to do mathematics. This means that we can translate the bulk of mathematics into those settings--- where mathematics means the study of particular structures like rings, groups, vector spaces, etc. These rich categories also provide a good place to do logic/lambda-calculi; from which we get the idea of categorifying Haskell and seeing where that leads us (i.e., asking what Hask looks like).

However, standard category theory does not provide a good place for doing category theory. In order to provide a good place for doing category theory, people move on to enriched CT and higher CT[1]. HCT is about coming up with category theoretic definitions for things like co/limits, adjunctions, etc, while moving away from the set theoretic notions inherited from the original conceptions of these terms. In other words, HCT is a good place for doing *meta*mathematics (and metalogic).

While there are apparent similarities, there are big differences between doing mathematics and doing metamathematics, and one should be careful not to get them confused. Asking what Haskell looks like when viewed from CT is very different than asking what portions of CT we can implement in Haskell. Haskell is a great place for doing mathematics, but I'm wary of how good it is for doing metamathematics; we conflate too many things which should be kept distinct (e.g., morphisms vs exponentials) and we fail to monitor the boundary between object and meta languages (e.g., a morphism in a category vs a mapping as described in the language of category theory).


[1] For more discussion on this point, see n-Lab and n-Cafe:

    http://ncatlab.org/
    http://golem.ph.utexas.edu/category/

--
Live well,
~wren

_______________________________________________
Haskell-Cafe mailing list
Haskell-Cafe@haskell.org
http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/haskell-cafe

Reply via email to