I might be wrong, but the impression I always had is that that field is something that most developer struggle to keep in sync. Maybe it was provisional ages ago, but they simply forgot to upgrade to "stable" or they are simply too humble and think "How am I to judge if a package is stable or not"? :)
My 2 cents :P A. On 10 February 2013 20:38, Petr Pudlák <[email protected]> wrote: > Dear Haskellers, > > Looking at Control.Monad: > http://hackage.haskell.org/packages/archive/base/4.6.0.0/doc/html/Control-Monad.html > I see: "Stability provisional". I checked some older versions and it's > the same. This feel somewhat unsettling - if Control.Monad is provisional, > do we have any "stable" packages at all? > > Best regards, > Petr Pudlak > > _______________________________________________ > Haskell-Cafe mailing list > [email protected] > http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/haskell-cafe > >
_______________________________________________ Haskell-Cafe mailing list [email protected] http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/haskell-cafe
