* Martin Drautzburg <[email protected]> [2013-03-04 21:21:30+0100]
> On Sunday, 3. March 2013 21:11:21 Roman Cheplyaka wrote:
>
> > Admittedly, programming with callbacks is not very pleasant. So we have
> > an excellent alternative — the continuation monad transformer!
> >
> > This nested code
> >
> > something1 $ \x -> do
> > something2 $ \y -> do
> > something3 $ \z -> do
> >
> > can be equivalently rewritten as this linear code
> >
> > import Control.Monad.Cont
> >
> > flip runContT return $ do
> > x <- ContT something1
> > y <- ContT something2
> > z <- ContT something3
> > lift $ do
> > ...
>
> Mind-blowing. Thanks a lot. Before I dig into the continuation monad
> transformer, one more question (demonstrating my ignorance):
>
> The initialization actually starts with
>
> main = (do
> SndSeq.withDefault SndSeq.Block $ \h -> do
> Client.setName (h :: SndSeq.T SndSeq.DuplexMode) "Haskell-Melody"
> Port.withSimple h "out"
> (Port.caps [Port.capRead, Port.capSubsRead, Port.capWrite])
> (Port.types [Port.typeMidiGeneric, Port.typeApplication]) $ \p -> do
>
>
> So there are some plain actions like "Client.setName" and "Port.withSimple"
> before it gets to the next "do" block. How would I write this in ContT style?
You can use the "lift" function to lift actions from the underlying
monad to the transformer. In your case it'd be something like
flip runContT return $ do
h <- ContT $ SndSeq.withDefault SndSeq.Block
lift $ Client.setName (h :: SndSeq.T SndSeq.DuplexMode) "Haskell-Melody"
p <- ContT $ Port.withSimple h "out"
(Port.caps [Port.capRead, Port.capSubsRead, Port.capWrite])
(Port.types [Port.typeMidiGeneric, Port.typeApplication])
...
Roman
_______________________________________________
Haskell-Cafe mailing list
[email protected]
http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/haskell-cafe
