Thanks for your examples. On 27/08/13 13:59, Albert Y. C. Lai wrote: > The correct fix is to raise the stack cap, not to avoid using the stack. > > Indeed, ghci raises the stack cap so high I still haven't fathomed where > it is. This is why you haven't seen a stack overflow in ghci for a long > time. See, ghci agrees: the correct thing to do is to raise the stack cap.
If I understand this correctly, you agree that the stack size should be unlimited by default? _______________________________________________ Haskell-Cafe mailing list Haskell-Cafe@haskell.org http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/haskell-cafe