Thanks to all for your replies!
I asked the question because I often make this kind of transformations
(please don't mind the non-sensical example):
test :: Bool -> IO ()
test foo = do
bar <- case foo of
True -> return "Foo"
False -> return "Bar"
return ()
into
test :: Bool -> IO ()
test foo = do
let bar = case foo of
True -> "Foo"
False -> "Bar"
return ()
And was wondering why can't I maintain the initial (and nicer) indentation.
But since let allows for several bindings, it make sense...
Best,
Corentin
On Thu, Oct 3, 2013 at 8:31 PM, Corentin Dupont
<corentin.dup...@gmail.com>wrote:
> test :: Bool -> IO ()
> test foo = do
> let bar = case foo of
> True -> "Foo";
> False -> "Bar"
> return ()
_______________________________________________
Haskell-Cafe mailing list
Haskell-Cafe@haskell.org
http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/haskell-cafe
