On Oct 12, 2013, at 2:47 PM, Niklas Hambüchen <m...@nh2.me> wrote: > > I would like to come back to the original question: > > How can ordNub be added to base? > > I guess we agree that Data.List is the right module for a function of > type Ord a => [a] -> [a], but this introduces > > * a cyclic dependency between Data.List and Data.Set > * a base dependency on containers. > > What is the right way to go with that? > > Should ordNub be introduced as part of Data.Set, as Conrad suggested? > > It does not really have anything to do with Set, apart from being > implemented with it.
I think nub's behavior is rather set-related, so I don't really understand the objection to putting it in Data.Set. Anthony > >> On 14/07/13 14:12, Roman Cheplyaka wrote: >> Something like that should definitely be included in Data.List. >> Thanks for working on it. >> >> Roman > _______________________________________________ > Haskell-Cafe mailing list > Haskell-Cafe@haskell.org > http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/haskell-cafe _______________________________________________ Haskell-Cafe mailing list Haskell-Cafe@haskell.org http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/haskell-cafe
