Udo Stenzel wrote:
(*>) :: Monad m => m a -> m b -> m a m *> n = do a <- m ; n ; return a
Right, that one is really useful. I named it (<<), though, conforming to (>>=) versus (=<<).
Christian _______________________________________________ Haskell-Cafe mailing list [email protected] http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/haskell-cafe
