On 9/27/06, Chad Scherrer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I was reading on p. 29 of "A History of Haskell" (a great read, by the
way) about the controversy of adding seq to the language. But other
than for efficiency reasons, is there really any new primitive that
needs to be added to support this?
As long as the compiler doesn't optimize it away, why not just do
something like this (in ghci)?
Prelude> let sq x y = if x == x then y else y
Prelude> 1 `sq` 2
2
Prelude> (length [1..]) `sq` 2
Interrupted.
There must be a subtlety I'm missing, right?
What if the types are not instances of Eq?
Jason
_______________________________________________
Haskell-Cafe mailing list
Haskell-Cafe@haskell.org
http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/haskell-cafe
