Hello Yitzchak, Wednesday, January 10, 2007, 12:02:25 PM, you wrote:
> Unfortunately, the current situation is that State is only > available as a lazy monad, and StateT is only available > as a strict monad. > At the very least, the two should be consistent. I > would much prefer for them both to be lazy. imho, lazy monads (as any other lazy things) is a source of beginner's confusion. therefore it may be better to provide "default" monads as strict and lazy ones - for one who knows what he wants - with a Lazy prefix, e.g. LazyST, LazyState... -- Best regards, Bulat mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _______________________________________________ Haskell-Cafe mailing list Haskell-Cafe@haskell.org http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/haskell-cafe
